|
Public Education vs. Public Schools
1-19-04
My entry into the debate over the problems with public schools began
in the early '90s. I noticed dramatic increases in my school property tax about
the same time that many other people were noticing reductions in student
performance. We formed some loose associations, compared our experiences and
came up with some solid workable solutions, school choice being the cornerstone.
But no matter what level of government
we approached we were always made cognizant of the fact that there were high
stakes politics involved that our children had to take a back seat to. Democrats
and the unions were not about to let go of their largest source of funding for
their campaigns and the liberal policies they were advancing.
I had to put my fight for
choice in education on the back burner a few years ago. My family and my
business needed my attention and my efforts at generating reforms appeared
futile against the Goliath of the public school establishment.
Then came a ruling by the US Supreme
Court that school choice was in fact constitutional. I once said that any system
of public education that does not incorporate choice is unconstitutional and the
Supreme Court has said as much in its ruling. That is the truth and its time for
New York's emotionally charged and intellectually vacuous Liberals to face
reality.
The only feasible solution to the
problem with public schools is freedom of choice, but the entrenched bureaucrats
have yet to even admit there is a problem. I recently heard a representative
from NYSUT demand more money and proclaim that education is the engine of our
economy. That is an egotistical statement and it is also wrong. Freedom of
choice is the engine of our economy and without it we will be doomed to the same
fate as that of the former Soviet Union.
I would also like to educate all of you
Liberals out there to the fact that the State of Vermont has always had a system
of choice in education. If the Supreme Court had ruled the right to choose
unconstitutional, Vermont would have had to spend billions of dollars in
upgrading its educational infrastructure. You see, a long time ago when Vermont
did not have enough public schools to handle the demands of its population, it
acknowledged parents' rights to send their children to a more proximate private
school free of charge.
It was a win-win situation. The state
did not have to borrow vast sums of money to build historically expensive public
school buildings and that money was instead redirected to existing classrooms.
They put the focus where it belonged, directly in the classrooms, not into a
top-heavy monopolistic system.
School choice will have a dramatic
effect on more densely populated states like New York. Due to a recent court
ruling, our State Legislature has been directed to develop a new formula for
funding public education. It is time for politicians to start acting like
statesmen and tell the education establishment that they have had enough time
and money to get it right. Its time to do it the American way, the only right
way, with the freedom to choose.
DRC
|