|
The EQ of
Liberalism 8-16-11
There’s a big difference
between being intelligent and being devious. Both can lead to
tremendous success and indeed intelligence plays a large part in
being successfully devious. But being devious has no roll in being
intelligent.
When I hear that Liberals think Barack
Obama is extremely intelligent, I think it’s time to provide them a
little more perspective.
Some twenty years ago, I found myself being
told I was wrong by so many people so often that I was being
consumed by self doubt. I was finding it difficult to make business
decisions involving investment risks.
I had a friend who, when disagreeing with me
about politics back then, asked if I ever considered the possibility
that I could be wrong. I was shocked and said of course. I
continually engaged in introspection, that internal debate that we
humans employ to form judgments. Didn’t he?
In order to help me to decide if I should
continue to find my own way or if I should simply submit to the
status quo that I thought was wrong, I submitted myself to an IQ
test at a MENSA membership drive.
The results gave me the confidence to invest
in my own business and ignore the voices of defeat around me. Those
voices are still there and in fact have become amplified.
Some time ago while listening to WGY radio in
the morning, the host interviewed an author of a book that
challenged the validity of intelligence. His book was about an
Emotional Quotient, or EQ, that he thought was more important to
human development. He used the tragic example of Bobby Fisher the
chess genius, to bolster his flawed theory. People of all stripes
are capable of losing their minds so I found his book to be a waste
of paper. But the real tragedy of promoting such a theory is that it
empowers people to base life’s decisions on their emotions, without
engaging in a moment of introspection.
That, in my opinion, explains why we have so
many Liberals in elected positions today. It is just so quick and
easy to manipulate peoples’ emotions in order to win an election.
But it’s no way to run a country.
David Crawmer
|