ANOTHER RESPONSE TO PATRICK STURN 6-13-11
To the Editor,
You gotta love Liberals - not content with putting their foot
in their mouth - some have to go for both feet.
I responded to a mere pittance of the content of Mr. Sturn's first letter and he
felt the need to write another to clarify what I had "misconstrued". He said I
"..insulted the intelligence and vilified the political values of anyone with
whom he happens to disagree". I thought I was perfectly clear that I was
insulting the intelligence and vilifying the political values (he forgot to
mention sanity) of LIBERALS. I appreciate the opportunity to restate that.
Then there's his stated inability to understand my comments on job creation and
business regulation. He demeaned the importance of intelligence when seeking a
job. That prompted me to suggest that intelligent people should create jobs
instead of seeking one. Mr. Sturn, are you aware of all the talk about jobs that
Obama is trying to create (and failing because that's not his job)? Do you think
rewarding the unemployed with extended benefits would create more unemployment
or less? Have you ever been an employer or are you viewing our economy through
the "narrow lens" of someone who's been an employee or government employee his
whole life? I have been all three but prefer being the employer that I have been
for the last fifteen years. Although with the massive regulatory burden being
imposed on me as such, a burden most employees (and apparently you) aren't even
aware of, it is getting increasingly difficult to create jobs. Lastly there's
his comment about my letters being "self-serving". Liberals often project their
own intentions when they try to impugn the motives of people with whom they
disagree by describing them as politically motivated or self-serving. They're so
predictable and transparent that I have often verified a detractor's likely
motivation by going to
www.seethroughny.org and typing in their name to
verify their public sector employment. You sometimes find their whole family is
employed by or retired from the State. Would that be public service - or self
service?
David Crawmer, North Greenbush
NOTE: Mr. Sturn replied to my previous
comments of 5/13/11 in the 6/9/11 edition of The Advertiser South.
Read
His Reply